Crypto concealment
in divorce.
Digital assets can be omitted from disclosure, fragmented across wallets, or described in ways that understate ownership and value. We turn the available financial and blockchain evidence into a clear, court-ready picture.
What exists, who controls it,
and what is it worth?
A crypto holding may leave indicators in bank statements, exchange records, tax material, devices, correspondence, company accounts, or prior representations of wealth. Blockchain records can then help test the disclosure against observable transactions.
A wallet address does not by itself prove beneficial ownership. Our work combines on-chain analysis with off-chain evidence and clearly distinguishes established facts, analytical findings, and matters requiring further disclosure.
The playbook we test
How we help
We review financial, corporate, digital, and open-source evidence for exchanges, wallets, counterparties, and unexplained crypto-related flows.
We map relevant blockchain activity, examine control and attribution, reconcile records, and value assets at legally relevant dates.
We provide focused findings, disclosure questions, schedules, witness evidence, and expert reporting for negotiation or proceedings.
Test the disclosure with evidence.
We can scope a proportionate review around the records already available and the issues that matter to the case.
Discuss a matter